About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 32, Number 6, July/August, pp.438-443

TECHNICAL NOTE: Papain Adulteration in 11-nor-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol- 9-carboxylic Acid-Positive Urine Samples
Scott J. Larson1, Justin M. Holler1, Joseph Magluilo, Jr.1, Christopher S. Dunkley1, and Aaron Jacobs2
1Division of Forensic Toxicology, The Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rockville, Maryland 20850 and
2Air Force Medical Operations Agency, Brooks City-Base, Texas 78235

The adulteration of urine samples is an ongoing problem in forensic drug-testing laboratories, even in the military where the practice of observed collections is performed. These adulterants are used to produce a false-negative result when samples are analyzed for drugs of abuse. It has been reported that papain, a cysteine protease, could be successfully used as a urine adulterant, altering the concentration of 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9- carboxylic acid (THCCOOH) in urine samples. The current study analyzes the effects of latex papain (Sigma, 10 mg/mL) and Lawry’s® Adolph’s Meat Tenderizer (papain is an active ingredient, 10 mg/mL) on immunoassays (FPIA, EMIT, KIMS) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis for biological samples. The samples were analyzed initially between 2 and 4 h and then at 1-, 3-, 7-, and 10-day time intervals after the addition of papain. A decrease in response averaged over the course of the study was observed with FPIA (Abbott, 22%) and EMIT (Syva® Dade Behring, 26%, Microgenics, 10%) screening assays by the addition of latex papain to the samples. An increase in response was found using the KIMS (Roche) assay (156% increase). In addition, the GC–MS results (27% decrease) demonstrate that papain affects both the screening and confirmation assays. The addition of meat tenderizer caused a decrease in the FPIA (Abbott, 11%) screening assay and GC–MS results (22%) similar to the latex papain while having varied results on the other screening assays. This study confirms papain could be a potential problem for urine drug-testing programs.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |